Bishop of St Germans avoids direct response to Transforming Mission finance question
A response by the Bishop of St Germans, the Rt Rev Hugh Nelson, to a request at last Saturday's Diocesan Synod for transparency over Transforming Mission finances is reproduced below. Bishop Hugh did not directly respond to the request to provide the original sustainability model spreadsheets. We would be interested to hear of people's responses to this statement.
Bishop Hugh repeated figures produced by the Diocese earlier in the month relating to vastly increased youth work in Camborne Cluster following Transforming Mission. These figures contradict a Diocesan document produced in October 2018, which details extensive youth work across Camborne Cluster before the Transforming Mission programme was started there in 2019.
TRURO
DIOCESAN SYNOD 28/5/22
Vivian Hall Altarnun w Bolventor, Trigg Major
Deanery Synod, and General Synod
'Can you please provide the original sustainability model
spreadsheets for Cornwall’s Transforming Mission (Falmouth, Camborne,
Highertown, Liskeard and St Austell) projects in 2017 and 2019, including their
growth and development targets, plus up-to-date audits. Diocesan funds are
involved.’
All the diocesan funding involved in TM is properly, publicly and correctly audited either by the Church Commissioners or by the Diocese, and published in our Annual report and Accounts. Within the Diocese that includes being scrutinised by the Finance Assets and Risk Committee (FAR), Bishop’s Diocesan Council (BDC), Diocesan Synod and an external auditor.
As an added level of oversight and audit, the new Board for Chang/e and Renewal will oversee all our investment in change and growth, including TM, Lower Income Community Funding (LICF) and new mission funding arising from Deanery plans. This Board will report to BDC on a regular basis.
The original TM plans were made in close partnership with the Church Commissioners’, drawing on their considerable experience in investing in similar projects, many of which have proved to be remarkably fruitful. Research suggests that such projects reach a younger audience, lead to more people coming to faith and produce younger vocations. It is important to stress that the Archbishops’ Council funding was given expressly for these projects following their own rigorous process of approval. It is not available to be used for any other purpose.
Comments